當人民向政府機關申請政府資訊時，時常面臨《檔案法》與《政府資訊公開法》競合之問題，因兩部法律形成實務運作難以劃分的界線，而產生不少爭議，最終影響行政效能。為提供政府機關一套合理的判斷標準，本文透過蒐集司法判決實務上的不同見解，並摘錄兩法競合之重點，再引用行政法的基礎理論。諸如：依法行政原則、比例原則、公益原則等，討論司法實務見解的理由，企圖從司法實務的不同見解中，尋求合理判斷基準提供政府機關參酌。希冀能兼顧人民知的權利、國家安全、公務機密、個人隱私之保護與政府機關的行政效能，以避免後續爭議繼續存在。

When people apply for government information from government agencies, they often face the problem of concurrence of laws between Archives Act and The Freedom of Government Information Law. Because the two laws form a boundary that is difficult to demarcate in practical operation, many disputes have arisen, affecting administrative efficiency ultimately. In order to provide a set of reasonable judgment standards for government agencies, this article collects different opinions on the practice of judicial judgments, extracts the key points of concurrence of two laws, and quotes the basic theories of administrative law, such as the principle of administration according to law, the principle of proportionality, and the principle of public welfare, discusses the reasons for the opinions of judicial practice, and attempts to seek reasonable judgment standards from different opinions of judicial practice to provide the government with discretion. Hoping to take account of the right to know of the people, national security, official secrets, personal privacy protection, and the administrative efficiency of government agencies to avoid subsequent disputes.