本文旨在從德沃金平等自由主義的內在理路來探討其分配正義觀 點，進而導出「作為平等的正義」（justice as equality）結論並為之辯 護。本文的主要論點認為，德沃金的自由主義，不僅把自由、平等與 社群整合起來，同時藉由資源平等的制度設計─它要求把平等與責 任置於同樣重要的地位，落實了「作為平等的正義」理論目標。據 此，本文從德沃金平等原則基本論旨出發，依次檢視了「平等關懷與 尊重」及「倫理個人主義的平等原則」論點，接著考察德沃金「資 源平等」的正義制度設計，包括探討他如何論證資源平等優於福利平 等、假設性保險市場的論述，以及「敏於志向、鈍於稟賦」的正義理 念。最後則針對「自由與平等是否衝突」、「自由主義能否形成政治社 群」這些重要問題，為德沃金「作為平等的正義」理論進行反思與辯 護。

In this article, the author tries to clarify “justice as equality” by exploring what distributive justice Ronald Dworkin illustrated egalitarian liberalism. I argue that he has not only integrated liberty, equality, and community into his liberalism but has also justified a principle of justice, that is, justice as equality, with an emphasis on equality and responsibility in his theory of equality. In the first place I analyze the significance of “equal concern and respect” and “ethical individualism”. Secondly, I investigate Dworkin’s institutions of justice focused on equality of resources and point out the theoretical implications of “ambition-sensitive, endowment-insensitive”. For defended “justice as equality”, in conclusion this article discussed two philosophical controversies: “Do liberty and equality conflict?” and “How is liberal community possible?”.